It generally works well for day to day but in most cases will be better than a dedicated controller. Windows software raid vs hardware raid ars technica. Generally speaking hardware raid is superior to software raid, with several notable advantages including. The recommended software raid implementation in linux is the open source md raid package. On windows you are much better off with hw raid in just about every case. Sw raid on linux is much better than windows sw raid, which is limited in its support for different layouts and very slow at least it is on windows 2003 server. Because of this combination of software and silicon, intel vroc is called a hybrid raid solution. Here you will find all information you need to recover raid 5. Regarding linux software raid, i have gentoo linux em64t latest version compiled with cflags of marchcorei7avx mtunecorei7avx and after a complete recompile tuned for this platform, including the gcc4.
In this tutorial, well be talking about raid, specifically we will set up software raid 1 on a running linux distribution. I hate to say this, but it is obvious that a software raid like mdadm cannot grab raw disks as a whole. Winner intel there is quite a performance edge to gain by using a hardware controller, even nowadays. Intel has enhanced md raid to support rst metadata and orom and it is validated and supported by intel for server. Then e in first disk, like this it will continue the round robin process to save the data. Some linux users are reporting software raid issues with. Software raid is when you get your os to do the raid for you or have an integrated controller into your motherboard. Linux software raid often called mdraid or mdraid makes the use of raid possible without a hardware raid controller.
It is important to know that a disk configured to be part of an mdadm raid array can look like a broken efi disk. How to set up software raid 1 on an existing linux. Motherboard raid, also known as fake raid, is almost always merely biosassisted software raid, implemented in firmware and is closedsource. Theres hardware raid and then theres hardware raid. Software raid does its processing on the server motherboard.
Types of raid softwarebased motherboardbased adapterbased. Imho, intelbased motherboard raid is widespread and understood enough to be a reasonable option. This works the same for larger servers as well as desktop computers. Because the motherboard in the test machine had only four sata. Linux software raid is fine, you can mix and match hdd devices can be of different capacities the microservers have 4 built in hdd bays plus dvd ssd port. The server craps out, or you simply want to upgrade, all you need to do is move the. Choosing between software raid and hardware raid depends on what you need to. In a hardware raid setup, the drives connect to a special raid controller inserted in a fast pciexpress pcie slot in a motherboard. Raid stands for r edundant a rray of i nexpensive d isks. It has better speed and compatibility than the motherboards and a. We list the pros and cons of hardware vs software raid to help you decide which. Lets start the hardware vs software raid battle with the hardware side. That way, youre not dependent on the particular version of intels raid implementation on this motherboard. Hardware raid, which means buying a raid card, and installing it in your computer is good.
I didnt use the entire available space in order to speed up raid creation. Software raid is one of the greatest feature in linux to protect the data from disk failure. You will know about raid 5 disk failure and its recovery. Software is still used to do the raid calculations but on dedicated controllers. Any raid setup that requires a software driver to work is actually oftware raid, not hardware raid. We recommend linux software raid, optionally, with lvm. Whether software raid vs hardware raid is the one for you depends on what you need to do and how much you want to pay. Usually, hardware raid has better performance with the advanced raid levels than software raid. Side by side, intel % change vs software raid 0 intel performance increase over microsoft. Linux does not require any software installed to see the raid array. In this day and age, fake raid for example, motherboard raid solutions like intel rste, and good software raid are going to be very similar in performance and that the benefit of having a dedicated card more has to do with the dedicated cache than anything else in this day and age, but even then, thats for optimal write performance. The original report is pertaining to an asrock z97 extreme6 motherboard.
The advantage that software raid had in terms of speed have evaporated, leaving all block input fairly even across the board. Can you software raid storage presented to the hypervisor. A few phoronix readers have also reported similar issues such as in the forums and twitter. Combining raid0 and raid1 is often referred to as raid10, which offers higher performance than raid1 but at much higher cost as it requires a minimum of four disks. Theres nothing inherently wrong with cpuassisted aka software raid, but you should use the software raid that. All raid functions are handled by the host cpu which can severely tax its ability to perform other computations. Motherboard raid, also known as fake raid, is almost always merely bios assisted software raid, implemented in firmware and is closedsource. There are only two real options if youre serious about your data. Flexibility is the key advantage of an open source software raid, like linux mdadm, but. I have seen some of the environments are configured with software raid and lvm volume groups are built using raid devices. To put those sidebyside, heres the difference you can expect when comparing hardware raid0 to software raid0.
For the raid6 performance tests i used 64kb, 256kb, and 1,024kb chunk sizes for both hardware and software raid. Moving from windoze hardware raid to linux software raid. Can i detect hardware raid infromation from inside linux. Comparing hardware raid vs software raid deals with how the storage drives in a raid array connect to the motherboard, and the. Processorintensive raid operations are offloaded from the host cpu to a raid processor integrated into the. Also with software raid you dont have to worry about finding drivers for your system. This table summarizes the key differences between hardware and software raids. Sata 6 gbps raid card recommendation windows 10 forums. Motherboard based raid is an open invitation for the gods of entropy to come fuck up your day. Raid allows you to turn multiple physical hard drives into a single logical hard drive. With software raid at least, when using lvm which is the preferred method in ubuntu i believe, you can more easily handle device failures online, and. Standard raid levels include raid 0, raid 1, raid 2, raid 4, raid 5, raid 6, raid 10, etc. Ive been hoping other people would post with some experience, because im in the middle of a decision and am leaning toward software but just basically fear the unknown.
Using raid onboard as in the motherboardbased raid is a very bad idea unless you dont mind increasing the risk of losing your data. Data recovery raid 5 is a simple process you will know everything about raid 5, linux raid 5 recovery and how to recover raid 5. This software raid solution has been used primarily on mobile, desktop, and workstation platforms and, to a limited extent, on server platforms. From this we come to know that raid 0 will write the half of the data to first disk and other half of the data to second disk. I use software raid1 on linux using mdadm using whole disk devices no partitions.
Linux does have drivers for some raid chipsets, but instead of trying to get some unsupported, propietary driver to work with your system, you may be better off with the md driver, which is opensource and well supported. For this purpose, the storage media used for this hard disks, ssds and so forth are simply connected to the computer as individual drives, somewhat like the direct sata ports on the motherboard. If you mean a real hardware raid controller with batterybacked cache and such, then sure. Onboard raid vs windows 10 raid speed test experiment youtube.
You typically find hardware raid controllers in server mobos, and fake raid controllers in desktop systems. There are 2 major types of raid controllers including software and hardware raid. To make switching to linux easier for our fellow gamers and pc enthusiasts, we made a list of motherboards that work outofthebox on ubuntu or on ubuntubased linux distributions works outofthebox means the motherboards audio, lan, wifi, and bluetooth function properly after a fresh installation of an os operating system. I think in hardware raid, if the hardware fails on the raid, you need the exact copy of the hardware to recover the data, i. Infact software raid is much more flexible and the performance will at least be the same if not better. Comparing hardware raid vs software raid setups deals with how the storage drives in a raid array connect to the motherboard in a server or pc, and the management of those drives.
Asrock motherboard destroys linux software raid hacker news. Software raid are available without using physical hardware those are called as software raid. In testing both software and hardware raid performance i employed six 750gb samsung sata drives in three raid configurations 5, 6, and 10. But if you just mean one of those cheapo, onboard fakeraid controllers then, no, theres no reason to like them over software raid. Recovery software understands raid arrays created with it enough for recovery to be fine, and its compatible across many generations and revisions of board, so replacing a failed one is easy.
When storage drives are connected directly to the motherboard without a raid controller, raid configuration is managed by utility software in the operating system, and thus referred to as a software raid setup. Using raid 0 it will save as a in first disk and p in the second disk, then again p in first disk and l in second disk. Creating software raid0 stripe on two devices using. I originally had wanted to do raid10 via the motherboards native raid but could not configure it in a nonmswindows. Secondly, linux does support raid, but it recognises the deficiency of software raid over hardware raid. Hardware raid will cost more, but it will also be free of software raid s. Shown below is the graph for raid6 using a 256kb chunk size. Instead of using motherboard raid to create a raid1 array can i present two vanilla hard drives to esx and then present mirrored storage to vms. Intel raid on your motherboard, is something people in the linux world refer to as fake raid and what is does is that a raid bios on your motherboard handles raid commands using the cpu to issue those commands rather then a dedicated raid controller, so under heavy readwrite situations, disk io will use more cpu resources than a real.
If you have to replace the motherboard, you may lose the raid configuration either because the firmware stores it in nvram, or because the new mb doesnt support the same raid implementation. Trying to find the best raid option with what i got, so i decided to test the speed difference between onboard raid and software raid in windows. Intel virtual raid on cpu vroc utilizes intel vmd to aggregate nvme ssds allowing bootable raid. The advantage of software raid is that its hardware independent. Different types of raid controllers support different raid levels. And the last type of raid is a software only raid, where there are kernel modules that perform all of the array functions. We have lvm also in linux to configure mirrored volumes but software raid recovery is much easier in disk failures compare to linux lvm. Given that the performance is similar, id go with the windows raid. In a hardware raid setup, the drives connect to a raid controller card inserted in a fast pciexpress pcie slot in a motherboard. Raid controllers 124 of over 3,000 results for electronics. Theres very limited support for soft raid options, which are generally what you get on desktop hardware, owing to a the huge performance limitations and reliability issues they cause compared to a proper cacheandbattery raid controller. Lowend hardware raid vs software raid server fault.
I would do linux mdadm raid myself but since youre on windows, windows raid is probably ok. There are many raid levels such as raid 0, raid 1, raid 5, raid 10 etc. With software raid at least, when using lvm which is the preferred method in ubuntu i believe, you can more easily handle device failures online, and also have better control of how theyre handled. As far a i know, you cant do that with mdadmlinux software raid since the only foreign metadata formats it supports are intelr matrix storage manager and ddf you have to get a exact or similar motherboard or a controller with the same chip and probably firmware and be extremely cautious when importing the drives or otherwise your data is lost. Motherboard raid, also known as fake raid, is almost always merely biosassisted software raid, implemented in firmware and is closedsource, proprietary, nonstandard, and often buggy, and almost always slower than the timetested and reliable software raid found in linux. How to create a software raid 5 in linux mint ubuntu. Softwareimplemented raid in linux is on par with most other raid in reliability and performance. Raid can be created, if there are minimum 2 number of disk connected to a raid controller and make a logical volume or more drives can be added in an array according to defined raid levels. Hardware raid will cost more, but it will also be free of software raids.
830 1095 1049 435 342 1601 1146 878 196 51 1268 125 1570 950 1135 118 657 156 296 697 528 1402 1338 1039 722 1275 1368 460 397 1037 750 920 1330 583 1044 993 139 475 1387 545 520